Welcome to Apartment Building Trader

Archive for November, 2007

The Effects of Foreclosures on the Rental Market

Tuesday, November 13th, 2007

The Los Angeles Times recently posted an interesting Q&A. The expert answering the Q&A was Nicolas P. Retsinas, director of the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University.

Nicolas P. Restinas answers several questions regarding the effects foreclosures will have on the rental market. Restinas states that the numerous owners are becoming renters and creating a high demand for housing, a restrained supply and thus causing a rise in rents.

He goes on to predict a steady rise over the next two to three years and believes that this may extend even further — possilbly into the next five years. He makes note of a slight offset due to the fact that some foreclosed properties will not be sold and converted as rentals. Nonetheless, his overall view is that rents will be on the rise as demand for housing increases! -L.A. Times (Full Article)

Real Estate Investing In a Difficult Market

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

Since August of this year, when the sub-prime fallouts caused a ripple of fear felt by most real estate investors, many questions have come to mind. Is the market going to tank?  How long will it take to recover? How far will prices or interest rates fall or rise before it makes sense to invest again? What do buyers, sellers and investors do in the meantime?

Real estate markets by their very nature are cyclical. In Southern California in particular, we have benefited greatly from rapidly ascending property values and tidy profits on relatively short-term investments. How long can this last, is the question. As far as home prices go, here is an astounding statistic. The ratio of housing costs to household income in California is 8 to 1, as opposed to 4 to 1 in places such as Seattle. The national average is 2 to 1. This means that a California homeowner is paying eight times his annual salary for his home. One does not have to be a mathematician to conclude that such upside down economics have to change.

I recently had a very nervous client ask my advice about what she should do with the equity coming out of a property she had sold. Poised to do a 1031 exchange to defer taxes on the gain, she was hearing such horror stories from the prognosticators of doom that she was considering paying the capital gains tax and putting her money into stocks, bonds or even CDs. The fear of making a bad investment decision was beginning to outweigh her reluctance to pay the IRS.

In speaking further with the client, I learned that what she was hearing from her well-intentioned friends and associates had more to do with the downturn in the residential market than in commercial. Since she had sold a commercial investment property and would need to replace it with another investment property to satisfy her like-kind exchange, we started looking at her options and trying to decide which ones held the lowest possible risk, if in fact we are heading into a down market.

As real estate cycles are nothing new, it is helpful to look back and see what types of properties have traditionally held their value in good times and bad. Even in the worst of markets, such as that of the early 90’s following the tax law changes and the oil crisis, there are two property types that have weathered the storms with relative ease. They are well-anchored, multi-tenant retail centers and newer, well-located multi-family properties. Here are a few reasons why this is true.

When the economy is in a slump, consumers still need to shop, and do so more frugally. Whereas the higher-end, pricier boutiques and specialty centers may not be able to hold on, a newer regional or neighborhood center anchored by a grocer, a solid discounter such as Wal Mart or Target, and mid-priced soft goods retailers will fare well. As families become more budget conscious, they are more likely to shop at Target, buy clothes at Old Navy or TJ Maxx, and fix up their homes with products from Home Depot. My advice to the client was, if she is considering putting her money into a retail center, look for one such as the one I just described, where the occupancy is stabilized with creditworthy tenants on long-term leases.

Likewise, when the economy slows, many potential new home buyers will be looking at renting instead of buying a home. This is particularly true at this time with the uncertainty in the residential lending markets. Looking for newer, Class A multi-family properties in infill locations where the job market remains strong is a good investment strategy. As more renters come into the market and occupancy levels rise, rents will rise accordingly, creating greater value. Likewise, there will be fewer competing properties built /as credit remains tight. Therefore, well-located apartment properties would be an equally good choice.

I also reminded the client that one important thing to keep in mind is that real estate should not be considered a short-term investment. There are times when investors have been able to flip properties and make tremendous short-term gains, but these times are rare and probably not a safe bet for the future. A savvy real estate investor will consider the long-term benefits of owning exceptionally high quality real estate, such as retail and multi-family, and hold on to it until it reaches maximum appreciation. How long this might be is anyone’s guess, but a good rule of thumb is somewhere between 7-10 years.

Real estate investing is inherently risky, and never more so than in an uncertain market. Wise investors will look at mitigating the risk, however, rather than pulling out and missing opportunities for future profits. Almost anyone can make money in a boom market. It is more challenging to make money in today’s market, but it can be done.

Written By
Jane Hope, CCIM
Vice President - Sales and Marketing
Contact AptBldgTrader Investment Group for further information about Jane Hope and SCI

Fed Keeps In Theme With Halloween - Its A Slasher

Thursday, November 1st, 2007

(Picture)

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 25 basis points to 4-1/2 percent.

Economic growth was solid in the third quarter, and strains in financial markets have eased somewhat on balance.  However, the pace of economic expansion will likely slow in the near term, partly reflecting the intensification of the housing correction.  Today’s action, combined with the policy action taken in September, should help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and promote moderate growth over time.

Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but recent increases in energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put renewed upward pressure on inflation.  In this context, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain, and it will continue to monitor inflation developments carefully. 

The Committee judges that, after this action, the upside risks to inflation roughly balance the downside risks to growth.  The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were:  Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Charles L. Evans; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner;
Frederic S. Mishkin; William Poole; Eric S. Rosengren; and Kevin M. Warsh.  Voting against was Thomas M. Hoenig, who preferred no change in the federal funds rate at this meeting.

In a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a 25-basis-point decrease in the discount rate to 5 percent.  In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, and San Francisco.

Condo Project Haulted

Thursday, November 1st, 2007

The Ventura County Star reports a large condo project in Simi Valley has stopped in mid-development, “Citing slumping market conditions, a developer has abruptly halted construction of a 66-unit condominium development near what is known as Happy Face Hill in Simi Valley, city officials said Tuesday.”

More: “After several months of grading work, Encino-based Larwin Co. told City Manager Mike Sedell in an e-mail that construction of the housing development on 10 acres near Kuehner Drive would be stopped for at least six months.” - Los Angeles Times (Full Article).